fbpx

UPSC Previous Year question paper -2006- 2010- Judiciary & Legal Rights

by

PREVIOUS YEAR QUESTION PAPERS

UPSC previous year question paper of subject Judiciary & Legal Rights from the year 2006- 2010 with answers.

Contents

Results

#1. Consider the following statements : [2010] The Supreme Court of India tenders advice to the President of India on matters of law or fact: 1. on its own initiative (on any matter of larger public interest). 2. if he seeks such an advice. 3. only if the matters relate to the Fundamental Rights of the citizens. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

#2. With reference to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, consider the following : [2010] 1. The Rights of Development 2. The Right to Expression 3. The Right to Recreation Which of the above is/are the Rights of the child ?

#3. With reference to Lok Adalats, which of the following statements is correct? (2010)

#4. With reference to Lok Adalats, consider the following statements: [2009] 1. An award made by a Lok Adalat is deemed to be a decree of a civil court and no appeal lies against there to any court. 2. Matrimonial/Family disputes are not covered under Lok Adalat. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

#5. Consider the following statements: [2008] 1. Justice V R Krishna Iyer was the Chief Justice of India. 2. Justice V R Krishna Iyer is considered as one of the progenitors of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Indian judicial system. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

#6. How many High Courts in India have jurisdiction over more than one State (Union Territories not included)? [2008]

#7. Consider the following statements: [2007] 1. The mode of removal of a Judge of a High Court in India is same as that of removal of a Judge of the Supreme Court. 2. After retirement from the office, a permanent judge of a High Court cannot plead or act in any court or before any authority in India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

#8. Consider the following statements: [2006] 1. A person who has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court cannot plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except of the Supreme Court. 2. A person is not qualified for appointment as a Judge of a High Court in India unless he has for at least five years held a judicial office in the territory of India. Which of the statement(s) given above is/are correct?

#9. Who was the Chief Justice of India when Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was introduced to the Indian judicial system? [2006]

#10. Assertion (A): In India, every State has a High Court in its territory. Reason (R) : The Constitution of India provides a High Court in each State. [2006] Codes:

finish

Google search

Issues in Questions?

Tell us.!!