UPSC question paper – 1996 – 2000-Judiciary & Legal Rights

by

 

Results

#1. A British citizen staying in India cannot claim the right to: (1999)

#2. Consider the following statements: [1996] No one can be compelled to sing the National Anthem since: 1. it will be violative of the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression 2. it will be violative of the Right to the Freedom of Conscience and practise and propagation of religion 3. there is no legal provision obliging anyone to sing the National Anthem

#3. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion etc. (Article 15 of the Constitution of India) is a Fundamental Rights classifiable under: (1995)

#4. Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A) : Wilful disobedience or non-compliance of Court orders and use of derogatory language about judicial behaviour amount to Contempt of Court. Reason (R) : Judicial activism cannot be practised without arming the judiciary with punitive powers to punish contemptuous behaviour. In the context of the above two statements which one of the following is correct? (1997)

#5. According to the Constitution of India the term ‘district judge’ shall not include: (1996)




#6. When the Chief Justice of a High Court acts in an administrative capacity, he is subject to : [1996]

#7. The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the State falls under its: [1996]

Previous
Finish

Google search

Looking for More Resources?