The Hindu – Important News Articles & Editorial Analysis
Core Sector Growth Slows to 0.5%; Crude and Coal Contract
Latest Ministry of Commerce and Industry data show the growth rate of India's eight core industries fell to just 0.5% in May 2026 — the second-lowest in 21 months (after October 2025's −0.1% contraction). With five of eight sectors contracting, the figure raises a question mark over industrial-production momentum and could drag down the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) in coming months.
Sector-wise Performance (May 2026)
| Sector | Growth | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Coal | −9.3% | Worst in 10 months |
| Refinery Products | −8.7% | Lowest in 3.5 years |
| Natural Gas | −4.9% | Worst in 3 months |
| Crude Oil | −4.6% | Deepened from −3.9% in April |
| Fertilizer | −0.9% | 3rd straight decline, but moderating |
| Electricity | +8.7% | Amplified by low-base effect |
| Cement | +8.4% | Infra-driven growth |
| Steel | +5.0% | Lowest in 16 months |
Primary Reasons for the Slowdown
- Petroleum/energy slump: High-weightage crude, gas and refinery products fell simultaneously, dragging the whole index.
- International markets & imports: Softening global crude prices plus higher imports scaled down domestic production.
- West Asia crisis: Geopolitical tension hit refinery export cycles and production schedules.
Concept Booster: The Eight Core Industries
- The eight: Coal, Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Refinery Products, Fertilizers, Steel, Cement, Electricity.
- Share in IIP: ~40.27% of total IIP weightage — any core-sector slowdown directly hits overall industrial growth.
- Weightage order (high→low): Refinery Products > Electricity > Steel > Coal > Crude Oil > Natural Gas > Cement > Fertilizers.
The fall to 0.5% signals a temporary phase of industrial sluggishness. Infra-linked cement and electricity are advancing, but the crisis in the energy-fuel matrix (coal, oil, gas) runs deep. Amid the West Asia crisis, the government must bolster energy self-reliance, accelerate domestic crude exploration and build resilient supply chains to put growth back on track.
Which of the following industries is not included in the ‘Index of Eight Core Industries’?
- (a) Steel
- (b) Cement
- (c) Textiles
- (d) Natural Gas
Click to reveal answer
Answer: (c) TextilesDoval Hosts NSAs of BRICS Nations Amid West Asia Tensions
Under its BRICS presidency, India hosted the two-day BRICS National Security Advisors' meeting in New Delhi, with NSA Ajit Doval welcoming counterparts from Iran, China, Brazil and others to review the global security architecture. The meeting reflects how BRICS has expanded beyond economic cooperation into global security and strategic issues.
Core Agenda
- Central theme: “Non-traditional security challenges confronting the world today.”
- Technological threats: Focus on the evolving role of new technologies and ICT in emerging threats.
- Counter-terrorism: Review of outcomes from the BRICS Joint Working Groups on Counter-Terrorism.
Key Bilateral Threads
| Track | Highlight |
|---|---|
| India–Iran | Doval & Iran's SNSC Deputy reviewed West Asia; first senior Iranian visit after Iran's US peace deal |
| India–China | MEA called the Doval–Wang Yi meeting “positive and forward-looking”; gradual normalisation since the 2020 standoff |
| Tehran–Beijing | China reaffirmed support for Iran's sovereignty; both pledged to fortify their strategic partnership |
India Implications: The Expanded BRICS-11
After the 2024–2025 expansions, BRICS is now an 11-member bloc — the founding five (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) plus Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Forging consensus is a major diplomatic test for India, given divergent strategic views (notably Iran vs UAE) on West Asia.
Hosting the BRICS NSA meeting underscores India's growing mediation capability and diplomatic footprint. Navigating West Asia's crises and the China border talks, India has leveraged the forum to shape the security agenda and protect national interests — laying a security foundation ahead of the BRICS Summit in India in September 2026.
What is the primary objective of the “New Development Bank” (NDB) in the context of BRICS?
- (a) To enhance military cooperation
- (b) To provide development and infrastructure financing to member countries
- (c) To formulate global trade rules
- (d) To promote nuclear cooperation
Click to reveal answer
Answer: (b) To provide development and infrastructure financing to member countriesWorld is Moving On from Paying Publishers — India Should Too
The geopolitics of scholarly publishing has changed more in 18 months than in the prior two decades. Historically, a handful of commercial publishers charged exorbitant subscription fees or levied high Article Processing Charges (APCs). Now China, the US, Australia, Europe and Africa are cutting their dependence on these publishers and moving toward open access — making it critical to review India's standing.
Global Shifts
| Player | Strategy |
|---|---|
| China | Building ‘scholarly sovereignty’ — freeing research output/data from foreign publishers |
| United States | Strict scrutiny of publication costs & commercial exploitation of publicly funded research |
| Australia | National framework for Immediate Open Access — no paywalls or embargoes |
| Europe & Africa | ‘Diamond Open Access’ — neither author nor reader pays; public digital infrastructure |
India's Structural Challenges
- ONOS sluggishness: The ‘One Nation, One Subscription’ policy is stuck in protracted negotiations and financial gridlock with publishers.
- Heavy forex burden: IITs, IISc and Central Universities spend large foreign exchange yearly on Elsevier/Springer databases.
- ‘Pay-to-publish’ crisis: APCs (often lakhs of rupees) shift cost onto researchers, impeding dissemination of Indian research.
- Double jeopardy: Publicly funded (DST, DBT, UGC) research must be paid for again to publish or read.
India Implications & Way Forward
Under its STIP policy, India should build a national Diamond-Open-Access digital repository for all government-funded research; bargain hard with publishers using its market size instead of capitulating under ONOS; reform UGC evaluation metrics that fetishise foreign high-impact journals; and lead the Global South with Africa to build a shared open repository challenging commercial hegemony.
The current publishing model is economically and strategically unsustainable for a knowledge-driven India. As the world builds open, publicly governed knowledge systems, India must reframe research as a ‘public good’, not a commodity — redirecting hundreds of crores from foreign subscriptions to domestic infrastructure and research grants to become a self-reliant knowledge superpower.
What does “Article Processing Charge (APC)” refer to?
- (a) Patent registration fee
- (b) Fee charged for publishing a research paper in an open-access journal
- (c) University admission fee
- (d) Copyright renewal fee
Click to reveal answer
Answer: (b) Fee charged for publishing a research paper in an open-access journalNo One Should Own the Law: Why Government Standards Should Be Public
“No one should own the law” is a foundational principle of democratic governance — not unprecedented in India, where Ashoka disseminated edicts via stone inscriptions like Delhi's 7th Pillar Edict. With the Jan Vishwas Act, demands to free governance from the ‘steel cage’ have intensified, making free, central public access to all policy mandates — including safety standards — a strategic necessity.
The Web of ‘Shadow Instruments’
- Hidden rules: Beyond primary Acts, a vast web of regulations, circulars, OMs, public notices, guidelines and SOPs operates across ministries.
- Crisis of invisible law: Though not enacted by Parliament, these carry binding statutory force; if not publicly available, citizens are placed in inadvertent non-compliance.
- The IRC paradox: The Indian Roads Congress functions under government oversight (RTI-covered, NIC-hosted, official-dominated council) yet treats mandatory road-safety standards as ‘proprietary work’, issuing takedown notices against their dissemination.
The BIS Case Study
- Seven-year litigation: Carl Malamud uploaded 14,000+ BIS standards (National Building Code, helmet specs, drinking-water norms) for free; legal objections triggered a 7-year PIL in the Delhi HC.
- Counter-intuitive result: While freely accessible, public awareness rose and sales of physical BIS copies actually increased.
- Policy reform: A senior official directed free access on the BIS website, leading to withdrawal of the petition.
Global Frameworks
| Jurisdiction | Position |
|---|---|
| USA | Supreme Court: “no person can own the law”; ‘Works of Government’ cannot hold copyright |
| European Union | Mandatory safety standards are part of law; public access is of “overriding public importance” |
| United Kingdom | Retains ‘Crown Copyright’ but permits free reuse via an Open Government Data Licence |
Recommendations under Jan Vishwas
- Central repository: Index all mandates, circulars and safety standards on a single portal like ‘India Code’.
- ‘Null and void’ principle: Any standard not freely accessible on the central platform should be legally void — preventing harassment via ‘shadow circulars’.
- Clarity in classification: Distinguish binding shadow instruments from purely cultural/informational works (NBT, ASI) where copyright can persist.
Government mandates and safety standards are the essential ‘raw materials’ of democracy — a government ‘by the people’ is impossible without an informed citizenry. For ‘Make in India’ to succeed, India must first guarantee ‘Safe in India’ through unhindered, cost-free access; under the Jan Vishwas spirit, a distinct ‘Works of Government’ policy would translate good governance into grassroots reality.
What is the primary objective of the “Public Trust Doctrine”?
- (a) Protection of private property
- (b) Treating the State as a trustee of public resources
- (c) Increasing corporate taxation
- (d) Privatization of local bodies
Click to reveal answer
Answer: (b) Treating the State as a trustee of public resourcesNet FDI Jumped to $6.6 bn in April — Highest in Nearly 5 Years
India's Net Foreign Direct Investment surged to $6.6 billion in April 2026 — the highest monthly inflow in nearly five years (since the May 2021 peak) — driven by a 65% year-on-year jump in gross inflows. After six straight months of net-negative flows to February 2026, the rebound in the very first month of the fiscal year signals revived global investor confidence.
Key Figures
| Metric | Value (April 2026) | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Net FDI | $6.6 bn | Vs $917 mn in March 2026 — exponential jump |
| Gross FDI inflow | $15.3 bn | Largest single-month since at least March 2021; +65% YoY, +131% MoM |
| Gross outflows | $8.7 bn | Historic high; +13.7% over April 2025 |
| Outward direct investment | $4.8 bn | +42%; ~80% to USA & Cayman Islands |
- Top inbound sources: Over 75% of gross inflows came from Japan, Singapore and Mauritius.
- Gross vs Net FDI: Net FDI = Gross inflow minus repatriation/disinvestment and outward FDI; recorded under the Capital Account of the BoP.
- FDI vs FPI: FDI is long-term and strategic (assets, tech, jobs); FPI is short-term, volatile equity/debt — often called ‘hot money’.
India Implications
The pivot signals MNCs resuming long-term deployment, anchored by macro stability and the ‘China+1’ de-risking trend that PLI schemes have tapped. Record $4.8 bn outward investment shows Indian conglomerates expanding globally via M&A. The inflow fortifies forex reserves and cushions the rupee, but sustaining it needs continued Ease-of-Doing-Business reform and tax-policy predictability.
April's historic surge is an exceptionally positive signal for the economy, strengthening reserves and rupee stability. The policy challenge is to sustain the momentum across the fiscal year — through EoDB reforms, consistent fiscal/taxation policy and cross-sectoral infrastructure — to make India the world's preferred safe haven for global capital.
“Net FDI” means:
- (a) Only the total foreign investment flowing into the country
- (b) The amount obtained after deducting outflows and investment withdrawals from gross FDI
- (c) Only government investment
- (d) Only investment in the manufacturing sector
Click to reveal answer
Answer: (b) The amount obtained after deducting outflows and investment withdrawals from gross FDIThe Challenge of India's Digital Sovereignty
Digital infrastructure is now the pivot on which a nation's commerce, governance and security thrive or collapse. Recent events show that ‘software code’ and ‘cloud ecosystems’ — not tangible hardware — have become the new frontiers of geopolitical sovereignty. For a rapidly growing India, digital and technological sovereignty to safeguard strategic autonomy is no longer optional but an existential imperative.
Recent Crises & Vulnerabilities
- CCTV breach (April 2026): Chinese software platform ‘EseeCloud’ in Indian CCTV networks let hostile entities access sensitive defence-asset intelligence.
- Nayara Energy precedent (July 2025): Microsoft unilaterally enforced EU sanctions, decoupling Nayara from its own email, collaboration tools and cloud overnight.
- Core takeaway: Even data localised within India can be blocked or surrendered by foreign tech firms under pressure from their home governments.
Risks & the Power Transition Theory
- Software-defined warfare: Fighter-jet, missile and radar intelligence lives in embedded code; foreign makers could degrade targeting or restrict ranges in conflict.
- Kargil lesson (1999): The US denied India GPS access over mountainous terrain — a stark warning on tech dependence.
- Global decoupling: France (by 2027), the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany are shifting off US-centric platforms; per Power Transition Theory, a rising power invites containment, so India must insulate its tech framework.
A Four-Vertical Strategy
| Vertical | Action |
|---|---|
| Scale indigenous DPI | Replicate the UPI/RuPay model across cloud, e-commerce, authentication & defence; expand Zoho migration & NavIC |
| Reform defence procurement | Move beyond DPSU over-reliance; US-style state R&D funding + agile private firms (e.g. private role in AMCA) |
| Trusted partnerships | Asymmetric ‘mutual interdependence’ (BrahMos model); Micron's Sanand fab; US-led ‘Pax Silica’ AI/supply-chain initiative |
| Bridge the R&D deficit | GERD averaged just 0.74% of GDP (2000–2020) vs 2.07% global — scale up on a war footing |
India Implications
India's situation is uniquely precarious: it must build economic fortune on a tech infrastructure independent of foreign influence while avoiding both absolute isolation (China-style) and dependence. Successes like UPI/RuPay, NavIC, the Micron fab and AMCA private participation show the path — turning over-dependence into self-reliant capability with trusted partners.
For a country of India's scale, the question is not whether it can afford comprehensive technological sovereignty, but whether it can afford the strategic risk of abandoning it. In a fragmented international order, India's competitiveness and strategic autonomy will hinge on how rapidly it emancipates its digital and technological ecosystem from foreign vectors of control.
Raman Academy — North Oak, Sanjauli, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171006
WhatsApp / Call: +91 76499 11100 · ramanacademyshimla@gmail.com
